The Science of Mathematics believes that Artificial Intelligence and educational technology should be integrated thoughtfully to strengthen mathematics teaching and learning rather than replace sound pedagogy. NCTM and NCSM have highlighted that tools such as AI, digital platforms, and virtual manipulatives can enhance mathematical reasoning, support diverse learners, and provide insights into student thinking when used strategically by skilled teachers and instructional leaders. Early research on the effects of AI are showcasing how traditional study methods are more effective than having unrestricted AI assistance because they may reduce the cognitive effort needed for strong long-term learning. Mathematics leaders must ensure technology use prioritizes equity, protects data privacy, and keeps human judgment and meaningful mathematical understanding at the center of instruction. A publication from NCSM in 2025 is provided below to assist schools in evaluating the use of technology and AI in their schools. This document contains rubrics and questions that may be utilized by professionals in each context to maximize learning.
The National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics position paper “Leading with Technology: Enhancing Mathematics for All Students” argues that mathematics leaders should purposefully integrate educational technologies to strengthen instruction, support diverse learners, and improve assessment of student learning. It emphasizes that technology—including tools such as AI, digital games, and virtual manipulatives—should be used strategically with strong pedagogy to deepen mathematical understanding, promote problem solving, and expand equitable access to high-quality mathematics learning.
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics position statement “Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics Teaching” explains that AI tools can support mathematics learning by personalizing problems, offering multiple explanations, and helping teachers analyze student thinking. However, it emphasizes that AI cannot replace teachers and should be used carefully—students must develop strong mathematical reasoning and critical thinking to evaluate AI outputs, which may contain errors or bias.
The National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics (NCSM) document “Educational Technology & AI Guidance for Math Leaders” provides a framework to help mathematics leaders make thoughtful decisions about adopting educational technology and artificial intelligence in math education. It emphasizes that technology and AI should enhance mathematical reasoning, equity, and teacher decision-making, while leaders evaluate tools through considerations such as student agency, teacher autonomy, data privacy, and long-term impacts on learning rather than simply adopting tools for convenience.
Ju, Q. (2023). Experimental evidence on negative impact of generative AI on scientific learning outcomes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05629.
Chen, J. J., & Lin, J. C. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a double-edged sword: Wielding the POWER principles to maximize its positive effects and minimize its negative effects. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 25(1), 146-153.
Kudaisi, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Classroom-Exploring the Potency of MathGPTPro in Enhancing Secondary School Students’ Cognitive Proficiency in Circle Theorems.
Guler, N. K., Dertli, Z. G., Boran, E., & Yildiz, B. (2024). An Artificial Intelligence Application in Mathematics Education: Evaluating ChatGPT's Academic Achievement in a Mathematics Exam. Pedagogical Research, 9(2).
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2024). Generative AI can harm learning. The Wharton School Research Paper.
Barcaui, A. (2025). ChatGPT as a cognitive crutch: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial on knowledge retention. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102287.
Cullen, C. J., & Hertel, J. T. (2023). Improving our criticism of technology in mathematics education. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 116(5), 314-321.
Shin, D., Smith, R. C., & Kim, S. (2018). Evaluating technology for teaching mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 24(3), 156-163.
Romrell, D., Kidder, L., & Wood, E. (2014). The SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning. Online Learning Journal, 18(2).
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2015). ISTE standards. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards.